[MacPorts] #71823: Port installs useless llvm-17 and clang-17 over and over again on macOS High Sierra, version 10.13.6
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Mon Jan 13 12:42:05 UTC 2025
#71823: Port installs useless llvm-17 and clang-17 over and over again on macOS
High Sierra, version 10.13.6
------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: ballapete | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version: 2.10.5
Resolution: | Keywords: highsierra
Port: llvm-17 |
------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by ballapete):
This delivers a long list:
{{{
boost176 @1.76.0_13+no_single+no_static+python312
cppcheck @2.16.2_0
dvisvgm @3.4.2_0+mupdf
fswatch @1.17.1_0
gcc14 @14.2.0_1+stdlib_flag
gcc14-libcxx @14.2.0_1+clang17
gnutls @3.7.11_1+dane
gpgme @1.24.0_0
graphviz
@12.2.1_0+gdk_pixbuf+pangocairo+poppler+rsvg+x11
gtest @1.15.2_0
harfbuzz-icu @10.1.0_2
harfbuzz-icu @10.2.0_0
highway @1.2.0_0
libgcc14 @14.2.0_1+stdlib_flag
libgcrypt @1.11.0_1
libheif @1.19.5_1+kvazaar
libjxl @0.11.1_0
librsvg @2.58.5_0
libvpx @1.15.0_0
mesa @24.3.2_0+llvm
mysql8 @8.4.2_1
orc @0.4.40_0
pari @2.17.0_0+x11
poppler @24.04.0_1+boost
qt5-qtbase @5.15.15_2+openssl
texlive-bin @2024.70613_1+x11
xxhashlib @0.8.3_3
}}}
of which only `boost176` and `gcc14-libcxx` have a variant that uses a
more up-to-date compiler. Wouldn't it make more sense to decimate the
number of compilers and Python versions? Or wait a year or more before
`llvm-19/clang-19` becomes the `default`? Actually for nothing now…
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/71823#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list