keeping a (maximally) clean active tree
paul beard
paulbeard at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 15:41:35 PST 2007
On 12/7/07, William Davis <frstan at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> pardon, but doesnt using -R (-dfunR) take care of this?
Yes, it does The Right Thing if there a newly-introduced mismatch in a
port that has dependents.
-R also upgrade dependents (only for upgrading)
But I think that the OP was looking for a simpler way to upgrade
existing ports without using "force" or ideally with no flags at all
(well, maybe an optional -c).
using -fundR is 5 flags, and I usually add -c, so we're up to 6
arguments to do what many would expect to be the default operaion.
--
Paul Beard / www.paulbeard.org/
<paulbeard at gmail.com/paulbeard at gmail.com>
More information about the macports-users
mailing list