Portfile whitespace issues
pguyot at kallisys.net
Thu Mar 15 07:41:12 PDT 2007
> On Mar 15, 2007, at 3:12 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> There were not that many participants. I tried to put up a fight
>> in favor of keeping hard tabs, but I was the only one. :-) Upon
>> further consideration, I don't think I really care that much one
>> way or another, and I do recognize that a whole class of spacing
>> issues we currently have in Portfiles would not occur if we did
>> not use tabs. So, let's take 'em out!
> The old rule was that Porfiles should be internally consistent.
> That was it - and I don't think it's so bad to let portfile authors
> handle things however they want as long as the result isn't totally
> unreadable for everything else.
> So, my vote would be for continuing the old policy and not getting
> all whitespace-crazy on everything (it makes sense to have one
> whitespace convention for base/ code, though).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20070315/32c9daf6/PGP.bin
More information about the macports-users