missing antlr-2.7.7.tar.gz for tomcat5

[Ryan Schmidt]

On May 27, 2007, at 01:46, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

> On May 26, 2007, at 20:12, Valentin Kuznetsov wrote:
>
>> while attempting to build tomcat5 port the  antlr-2.7.7.tar.gz was  
>> missing from port lists:
>> --->  Fetching antlr
>> --->  Attempting to fetch antlr-2.7.7.tar.gz from http:// 
>> www.antlr.org//download/
>> --->  Attempting to fetch antlr-2.7.7.tar.gz from http://distfiles- 
>> od.opendarwin.org/antlr
>> --->  Attempting to fetch antlr-2.7.7.tar.gz from http://distfiles- 
>> msn.opendarwin.org/antlr
>> --->  Attempting to fetch antlr-2.7.7.tar.gz from http://distfiles- 
>> od.opendarwin.org/
>> --->  Attempting to fetch antlr-2.7.7.tar.gz from http://distfiles- 
>> msn.opendarwin.org/
>> Error: Target com.apple.fetch returned: fetch failed
>> Error: The following dependencies failed to build: struts antlr  
>> commons-lang commons-validator jakarta-oro
>> Error: Status 1 encountered during processing.
>>
>> In order to proceed I found this tar ball in gentoo disttrubution.
>> Could you please either update to newest version of this package  
>> or put elsewhere this tar ball.
>
> antlr 3.0 was just released on May 17, 2007, but already the 2.7.7  
> archive is no longer available from antlr.org. That's rather  
> inconvenient of them.
>
> antlr 3.0 seems to be substantially different than 2.7.7 and I  
> don't feel comfortable updating someone else's port to a new major  
> version. I don't know anything about antlr, so I don't even know  
> whether or not the antlr port should even be updated to 3.0, or  
> whether instead for example a new port antlr3 should be created.  
> I'm Cc'ing the maintainer. In the mean time, I'm changing the  
> port's master site so that 2.7.7 can be downloaded from a different  
> location.

This part of the portfile seems weird to me:

post-destroot	{
	reinplace "s|antlr-2.7.3/|java/|g" ${destroot}${prefix}/bin/antlr

The portfile is at version 2.7.7, but this reinplace is trying to  
match "antlr-2.7.3/" which does not exist in bin/antlr. Neither does  
"antlr-2.7.7/" for that matter. "antlr-2.7.7" does. Not sure if  
that's what was meant.