Getting "tcl wasn't compiled with threads enabled" error
Bernard Desgraupes
bdesgraupes at orange.fr
Sun Sep 2 02:48:21 PDT 2007
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2007, at 01:24, Bernard Desgraupes wrote:
>
>> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yet the original question still holds: why doesn't the Tcl Portfile
>> have the --enable-threads argument if threads are required to be
>> enabled when executing a "port selfupdate" ?
>
>
> Don't know, and there's no tcl maintainer whom we could ask. Does
> MacPorts even build itself against the MacPorts tcl if it's present?
> I thought it always used the system's tcl. Well, except obviously in
> your case it's using the /usr/local tcl but again that's only because
> gcc always looks there and we don't know how to turn it off.
I understand.
>
> The first lines of /opt/local/bin/port are:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> #\
> exec /usr/bin/tclsh "$0" "$@"
>
> So it seems the intention is to use the system's tcl, not MacPorts's
> tcl.
...and this is why it all works just fine like this in the default case.
This is because the system's Tcl _is_ compiled with threads enabled (see
last line in /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh). I had messed up my installation
because I had a freshly compiled Tcl which installed itself in
usr/local/bin and was not compiled with threads enabled.
>
> We could of course add --enable-threads to the tcl port if that's
> desired.
>
There could be a variant to turn this on. Anyway the current scheme is
the best, there's no point relying on a MacPorts-built Tcl when the
system's Tcl works just fine.
Thanks for the clarification,
Bernard
>
>
>
More information about the macports-users
mailing list