set deployment target from macports.conf
Harry van der Wolf
hvdwolf at gmail.com
Fri Aug 22 02:52:54 PDT 2008
!#@$
I can't get used to click reply all instead of just reply.
I'm on a couple of other mailing lists. The mail server of these lists set
the reply address automatically to the
macports-users at lists.macosforge.orgaddress. It prevents mistakes like
I made and keeps the mailing list
structured. This is also nice for mail clients that do automatic threading.
Is that an option here?
Harry
2008/8/22 Harry van der Wolf <hvdwolf at gmail.com>
> Thanks for the hints and the fast response. The options
> universal_target 10.4
> universal_sysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
> universal_archs ppc i386
>
> are exactly what I was looking for.
>
>
> It seems that I have an exciting (or frustrating) weekend coming up. I will
> install/build from trunk and compile the first ports with -d to see whether
> it does what I want them to do.
>
> I will let you know about my experiences.
>
> Harry
>
> 2008/8/22 Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org>
>
>
>> On Aug 22, 2008, at 04:39, Anders F Björklund wrote:
>>
>> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> Theoretically +universal should be able to handle this,
>>>>> but cross-compiling isn't really supported in MacPorts.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. So why did we expose the options in macports.conf again? :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Note that macports.conf in trunk has some more features...
>>> (which still isn't "supported", but rather "experimental")
>>>
>>> universal_target 10.4
>>> universal_sysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk
>>>
>>
>> Right, those are the options I was referring to.
>>
>>
>> universal_archs ppc i386
>>>
>>> That has a somewhat better chance of making the right
>>> thing than hacking macosx_deployment_target or flags.
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20080822/2a627681/attachment.html
More information about the macports-users
mailing list