Macports On Pure Darwin
Jordan K. Hubbard
jkh at apple.com
Sun Feb 17 19:49:58 PST 2008
On Feb 17, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Esteban Barahona wrote:
> That may be the main objective, but why not also support darwin
> without the propietary parts of Mac OS X? As I understand it, if it
> runs on Darwin it must run on Mac OS X... but I guess it's CLI-only
> apps...
Because it's more work (just being at the CLI doesn't mean MacOSX
technologies can't easily become dependencies) for pretty much no
gain. Darwin as a stand-alone OS is dead and has been dead for enough
years now that there's just no point in supporting it.
- Jordan
More information about the macports-users
mailing list