Strange GTK error

[Frank Schima]

On Jul 2, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:

> Frank Schima wrote:
>> gtk2 was the issue. As a follow-up question: for some reason, I have
>> both gtk1 and gtk2 active. Is there any reason to have both? In other
>> words, why might I have gtk1 active? I certainly did not install it
>> directly. I mean I understand that ports can be installed as
>> dependencies, but is there some port(s) that requires gtk1 over gtk2?
>> Is there a port command to tell me which ports may have required it?
>
> $ port dependents gtk1
>
> will show you installed ports depending on gtk1. Then you can use port
> dependents on those ports again until you find out what requires it
> finally. Unfortunately there is no automatic --follow-dependents for
> this command.

I ran this and it returned:

	gtk1 has no dependents!

So I assume I can remove it.


Thanks!
Frank Schima
Boulder, CO
schimaf at boulder.nist.gov