Dependencies relationship to default variants?

[Tabitha McNerney]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh at apple.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
>
> > So does this mean that Apple has modified the standard Kerberos open
> > source code with something proprietary that is non-discoverable (the
> > Kerberos open [ ... ]
>
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5.3/Kerberos-75.10.3/
>
> MIT (and now the Kerberos Consortium) has co-developed all of these
> features with Apple, so if you had appropriate access to the Kerberos
> Consortium's SCM system, you'd probably find the above on a branch
> somewhere.  Nothing proprietary about it.   That is not to say,
> however, that the kerberos5 port builds anything like the above bits
> (nor would the above bits willingly go into /opt without some
> persuasion).


Thanks tons Jordan for shedding light on this. I didn't mean to insinuate
that there was something proprietary and non-discoverable ... just that my
boss would kill me if I made a mistake by not asking or figuring out. Very
much appreciate your insight on Kerberos and how awesome it is that Apple
co-developed with the Kerberos Consortium!

T.M.


>
>
> - Jordan
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-users mailing list
> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20080711/868689e7/attachment.html