perl ports overwriting files, so need -f?

Daniel J. Luke dluke at geeklair.net
Fri Sep 12 08:43:06 PDT 2008


On Sep 12, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2008-09-12 14:45:28 +0200, Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Vincent Lefevre
>> <vincent-opdarw at vinc17.org> wrote:
>>> On 2008-09-12 13:00:53 +0200, Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
>>>> Do I get it right that one has to force a good part
>>>> of the perl ports to make them install?
>>>
>>> It's better not to install them.
>>
>> What about ports which depend on perl ports?
>
> In general, there is no reason to depend on such ports.


please stop trolling.
--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20080912/3b3eb24b/attachment.bin 


More information about the macports-users mailing list