[MacPorts] #20773: Add zope2.10

[Darren Weber]

I'm curious about using Plone, which is currently at version 3.3.  I've
downloaded the "unified installer" from http://plone.org/products/plone and
I'll take a look at the content of that package to see what the latest
dependencies are (most likely they are satisfied by some MacPorts).
However, it appears the zope port is outdated.

Is anyone else working on the Zope port?  Is it a significant dependency of
many other ports that are in wide use now?  That is, what reason is there
for the zope port to be "outdated", if any?  Are there functional reasons,
politics, superceded software, or what?

Thanks,
Darren




On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, MacPorts <noreply at macports.org> wrote:

> #20773: Add zope2.10
>
> -----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
>  Reporter:  martin@…         |       Owner:  macports-tickets@…
>     Type:  submission       |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  Normal           |   Milestone:
> Component:  ports            |     Version:  1.7.1
>  Keywords:                   |        Port:  zope zope2.10
>
> -----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
>  As stated on the mailing list ( http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail
>  /macports-users/2009-February/013697.html ) I think there should be a port
>  for zope2.10 (and probably zope2.9, zope2.11). As with the different
>  Python versions it is a dependency for other applications like Plone.
>
>  The attached port file is tested with MacPorts 1.710, Mac OS X 10.5,
>  Intel.
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20773>
> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
> Ports system for Mac OS
> _______________________________________________
> macports-tickets mailing list
> macports-tickets at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-tickets
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20090908/000be279/attachment.html>