atlas depends on gcc43 *and* gcc44 ???
stephen.langer at nist.gov
Wed Jun 2 14:13:20 PDT 2010
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Is there a downside to having atlas depend on gcc44 while everything
>> else depends on gcc43?
> Its just a little annoying that a package like atlas, which is a dependency of a dependency.... drags in a big build like gcc when I have no other reason for it... I understand that some packages may need a newer compiler than the standard OSX ones, but it would be nice if they could agree on which one ;)
I was wondering why anything depends on atlas at all. Is atlas noticeably better than the lapack and blas routines in the Accelerate framework? I couldn't find any comparisons on-line.
-- stephen.langer at nist.gov Tel: (301) 975-5423 --
-- http://math.nist.gov/mcsd/Staff/SLanger/ Fax: (301) 975-3553 --
-- NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8910, Gaithersburg, Md 20899-8910 --
-- "I don't think this will work. That's why it's science." --
-- Naomi Langer (age 6), 17 Feb 2003 --
More information about the macports-users