Will binaries built in 10.6 still run in 10.5?
Nikos Chantziaras
realnc at arcor.de
Sun Oct 3 20:52:48 PDT 2010
On 10/04/2010 03:44 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2010, at 17:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>> I noticed (by means of ps) that when ports builds something, I see this flag passed around: "-mmacosx-version-min=10.6" :-/ Am I in trouble? I need the binaries to work on 10.5 too.
>
> Then you need to set that in macports.conf. This was discussed here recently:
>
> http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2010-September/021880.html
>
> Note that this won't necessarily work for all ports. The most reliable way to get software built that runs on e.g. 10.5 is to build it on 10.5.
I tried this and added "macosx_deployment_target 10.5". However, the
wrong compilers are used then. Instead of:
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin10/4.2.1
/usr/libexec/gcc/ppc-apple-darwin10/4.2.1
for Intel and PowerPC respectively, these are used:
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin10/4.0.1
/usr/libexec/gcc/ppc-apple-darwin10/4.0.1
Is there a way to change that and use 4.2.1? AFAIK, 4.0.1 is only for
OS X older than 10.5. When "macosx_deployment_target 10.5" is set, the
compiler should be 4.2.1.
More information about the macports-users
mailing list