=?utf-8?Q?Re=3A_llvm=3A_?=clang not included in 2.8?
takashi at takashiyoshida.org
Tue Oct 12 20:10:41 PDT 2010
Yeah, I just noticed the clang was removed in llvm 2.8_1.
-- Takashi YoshidaSent with Sparrow
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 19:02, Takashi Yoshida wrote: That's strange. I just tried `which clang` and it came back with '/opt/local/bin/clang'. I also tried running `port contents llvm` and it listed '/opt/local/bin/clang' among other things as well. I had older clang installed from version 2.6_2 and 2.7_2 and recently upgraded it to 2.8_0. Here's what I get when I run: `port installed | grep llvm` llvm @2.6_2 llvm @2.7_2 llvm @2.8_0+clang (active) Strange part is that older versions do not have any variants listed (+clang) and when I upgraded to version 2.8, it appears like it picked up clang variant (which is not listed if you run `port info llvm`) automatically. You can try installing the older version of llvm but you may also want to hear from the maintainers first.llvm @2.8_0 included a clang variant which was on by default.The variant and clang were removed from llvm in 2.8_1. You'll have to ask the maintainer what the plan is with that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the macports-users