GCC Version

[Paul C]

Oh well, clang failed too. I think I'll put some time to the side and
recompile for ppc only.

Is clang a better option than gcc speed wise?
On Jul 21, 2011 7:16 PM, "Jeremy Huddleston" <jeremyhu at macports.org> wrote:
> sudo port -v install clang
>
> Then use:
> configure.compiler=macports-clang
>
> On Jul 21, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Paul C wrote:
>
>> On 21/07/11 17:21, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc45 does specify those --with-* options.
>>>>> gcc46 doesn't build gfortran, so it shouldn't be checking for that.
>>>>
>>>> $ port info gcc46
>>>> gcc46 @4.6-20110325, Revision 1 (lang)
>>>> Variants: gfortran, java, (-)universal
>>>>
>>>> Description: The GNU compiler collection, including front ends for C,
C++, Objective-C and Objective-C++. This is a prerelease
>>>> BETA version and does not have all available language front ends
enabled.
>>>>
>>>> sudo port install gcc46
>>>
>>> Ah, I didn't realize that gcc had a variant to enable gfortran and java
...
>>>
>>> Your email from 50 minutes ago (*:29) mentions that you see this issue
with gcc45 as well, but I see that you have gcc45 installed in your bugzilla
report.
>>>
>>> Since you're dealing with ppc64, I don't have expectation that these
issues will be addressed any time soon, but you might want to try clang and
apple-gcc42
>>
>> I've had clang mentioned already, how would I go about trying that out
for compiling ports? The apple gcc ports failed also. I think I'll give
clang a go if it's an option and then failing that compile for ppc instead.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20110721/cbc5b792/attachment.html>