perl5, perl5.* changes

[Dan Ports]

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:34:22PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote:
> I see this as a high-priority issue that affects many people. So if we
> can get things closer to working by revbumping a bunch of ports, we
> should do that ASAP. Is there any reason *not* to revbump p5-* (or more
> precisely anything using PortGroup perl5?)

If no one objects, I'll do exactly this today.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/