spe for Python 2.7?

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Mar 22, 2012, at 18:34, Dave Curtis wrote:

> 
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:40, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:18 p.m., Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:41, Dave Curtis wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm willing to give it a shot, but I'll need a clue or two.
>>>>> If I make the dependencies py-foo instead of py27-foo then  they should be satisfied by the py27 components on my system, correct?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Wait, really? If py-foo is a stub that depends on py27-foo, wouldn't requiring py-foo just cause the installation of py27-foo?
>> 
>> I misread Dave's message. Nobody should be declaring any dependencies on py-foo stub ports. Always declare dependencies on the specific version you want (py26-foo, py27-foo, etc.).
> 
> OK.  Agreement all around. Yay!
> 
> So... does that mean there *should* be py26-spe and py27-spe, etc, ports?

No. Spe is not a python module. Spe is a program that happens to use python. There is and should only be a single port called "spe".