Bacula question

Frank Schima macsforever2000 at
Tue Nov 13 15:22:25 PST 2012

On Nov 13, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at> wrote:

> On Nov 13, 2012, at 16:46, Phil Dobbin <phildobbin at> wrote:
>> That's what I'm trying to ascertain. What does that give you i.e is it
>> the same as bacula-client & bacula-common?
> We don't have any port called bacula-client or bacula-common?
> Try installing bacula +client_only; see if it gives you what you need.

I think Phil is talking about that on Linux. I believe the answer is yes. I have not actually tried to install bacula without the +client_only variant and so I'm not sure if the director will work on Mac OS X currently. At work our director is on Linux and we have many Mac clients that successfully use the bacula (+client_only) port - which I now maintain. 


More information about the macports-users mailing list