libgcc update ... to 4.9?

[Lawrence Velázquez]

On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:25 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:

> That ticket is about how compiler ports shouldn't install their own libstdc++ but use the system one.

Skim through to the end. It concluded with libstdc++ being split out into the libstdcxx port. Later Jeremy added more support libraries and renamed it libgcc.

> Would it at least be possible to provide a binary port for libgcc, to avoid having to build (a large part of) 2 gcc versions?

There already are binary archives, at least for Intel 64.

http://packages.macports.org/libgcc/

vq