OS X 10.11 status

[semaphore45 at yahoo.com]

It's a migrated machine from 10.10, latest version. Perhaps it would come from this single fact?

Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 2015-08-19, a las 13:07, Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> escribió:

> 
> 
>> On 19 Aug 2015, at 5:49 pm, "semaphore45 at yahoo.com" <semaphore45 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> It's not just a matter of compiling, but compilation TIME. It takes significantly longer than it would on 10.10. On the other hand, my test is done on a hardware machine, not a VM one, so I guess it's just another case of "it (doesn't) work on my machine.
> 
> Something is indeed up with your machine i would say. Compilation times in my vm compare very favourable to those in the host machine, running 10.10.
> 
>> 
>> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>> 
>>> El 2015-08-19, a las 11:53, Dominik Reichardt <domiman at gmail.com> escribió:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Am 19.08.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>>> On 19/08/15 16:13, C.T. wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Experience: 10.11 is still in beta, and it shows. With XCode beta, expect HOURS of compilations for a mere update, and many manual operations since MacPorts doesn’t yet recognizes El Capitan
>>>> 
>>>> I disagree on two of the three points.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, you should expect to compile all ports as there are no binary archives as of yet.
>>>> 
>>>> However, as long as you have the correct Xcode installed (the latest beta) and have installed MacPorts from source, it works just as smoothly in a VM where I am testing it as in the host OSX10.10 machine.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes its beta, but I've not had any significant issues in the limited playing I have done in the VM ...
>>>> 
>>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> Thanks, 
>>> yes, I know it is beta - that doesn't put me off very much, I've used previous betas since 10.7, so I know what to expect. Mostly at this stage it was ok.
>>> Whether I migrate during the beta and compile everything or later with the finished system, doesn't matter much to me anyway. Since I tend to need +universal or some other variant, I need to compile most ports instead of just getting the binaries. Also I'm not using that many ports, Gimp is the one with the biggest dependencies...
>>> 
>>> So, seems like I'll backup and jump...
>>> 
>>> Thanks again
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> El 19 ago 2015, a las 4:41, Dominik Reichardt <domiman at gmail.com> escribió:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I’m itching to switch but often need MacPorts. Do any of you have experience yet with it *AND* MacPorts?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In previous switches, I switched by using the development version of MacPorts and following the migration steps of any major OS X upgrade, still the way to go?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Take care
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dom
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> macports-users mailing list
>>>>>>> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> macports-users mailing list
>>>>> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
>>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> macports-users mailing list
>>>> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> macports-users mailing list
>>> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> macports-users mailing list
>> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users