openssl vs. libressl
Bradley Giesbrecht
pixilla at macports.org
Wed Nov 11 08:14:59 PST 2015
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:15 AM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> - when a user made the opposite choice (say libressl instead of openssl), doing `port install curl` (for example) will translate to `port install curl +libressl` which means s/he won't benefit of binary packages for curl when curl has not expressed a preference for libressl.
I believe most openssl dependent ports are not binary distributable due to the openssl license.
If libressl has a better license this would be a good reason to make it the default ssl and openssl the alternative.
Regards,
Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20151111/fa19bda6/attachment.html>
More information about the macports-users
mailing list