openssl vs. libressl

[Brandon Allbery]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:52 AM, <woods.w at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don’t believe a “better license” should be the dictating factor, I
> believe what should dictate what is included is what has better
> functionality. This is politics, and TBH is not a technical reason for
> inclusion or exclusion. TBH, I believe the only dictating factor should be
> technical, what does the job best, period. Everything else is ancillary.
> Something could have a much better license and be total crap.


For many people, being able to get binary archives instead of always having
to build from source is rather more than just "politics".

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20151111/7464f3aa/attachment.html>