openssl vs. libressl

[woods.w at gmail.com]

Yes in this case, its a convenance, what TECHNICAL benefits are there to changing ?

> On Nov 11, 2015, at 11:05 AM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM, <woods.w at gmail.com <mailto:woods.w at gmail.com>> wrote:
> But in this case, I don’t see one, openssl has been fine being distributed the way it is, its just that some people want a new-shiny here. 
> 
> So binary archives are a new-shiny with no practical significance. Got it.
> 
> -- 
> brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
> allbery.b at gmail.com <mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com>                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net <mailto:ballbery at sinenomine.net>
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net <http://sinenomine.net/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20151111/de5a9912/attachment.html>