openssl vs. libressl
Dominik Reichardt
domiman at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 01:45:32 PST 2015
> On 13.11.2015, at 10:33, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't really want into this kind of discussion, but
>
>> Libressl doesn't "emulate" OpenSSL. It is a derivative of OpenSSL with a focus on better architecture and security.
>
> AFAIK it's a rewrite (has to be, to avoid licensing/copyright issues) that aims to be API compatible. No matter its other goals of being better, that still means it emulates the original:
from www.libressl.org:
"LibreSSL is a version of the TLS/crypto stack forked from OpenSSL in 2014, with goals of modernizing the codebase, improving security, and applying best practice development processes.”
so, no rewrite.
More information about the macports-users
mailing list