running macports along with homebrew
mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com
Tue Aug 29 21:39:37 UTC 2017
On 29 August 2017 at 23:24, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 07:08, db wrote:
>> best practice for running macports along with homebrew
> The best practice is not to do that. We don't support it. It can cause you problems that we don't want to spend time investigating, because they wouldn't be problems if you hadn't also used a second package manager.
... but if you really really want to have Homebrow installed alongside
MacPorts, then the most important piece of advice is NOT to install
Homebrew to its default location. Put it under some obscure prefix and
ideally hide the path to Homebrew while installing new ports with
Having Hombrew under /usr/local and then using MacPorts (esp. without
the trace mode) is the best recipe for running into numerous problems
that are nearly impossible to fix. I would say that it's generally a
relatively bad idea to have Homebrew inside /usr/local, but of course
that depends on usage patterns.
Similarly, when you install Homebrew packages, hide the prefix to
MacPorts (even though some badly written configure scripts may still
look for files inside MacPorts prefix, but that's not as frequent).
As a general rule of thumb having just one manager is a lot
better/easier/safer. With two systems it's easy to run into problems
unless you know very well what you are doing.
But most important: in case you do end up with two systems, make sure
to quadruple check before submitting any bug reports to make sure that
the error is not due to the packages intermixed with each other. And
make sure to mention the fact that you are using two package managers
in any tickets or emails.
More information about the macports-users