running macports along with homebrew
Ryan Schmidt
ryandesign at macports.org
Tue Mar 6 01:34:18 UTC 2018
On Mar 5, 2018, at 05:43, db wrote:
> On 5 Mar 2018, at 11:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> hash+date is specific, predictable, repeatable. The portfile developer tests a specific hash+date, and when satisfied, commits it to make it available to MacPorts users.
>
> As I said in my previous post, you can get HEAD's hash with 'git ls-remote --heads'. And store it somewhere.
Who are you suggesting should run this command and when? The port maintainer? The user trying to install the port? MacPorts itself?
> Devel ports that use hash+date only add the date, and I doubt they are much tested.
As with any other port, at minimum, whoever committed the update should have tested that it builds on their version of macOS before committing.
> But hey, I'm glad Ken found this and I can use it locally at least.
I'm not disputing that it is technically possible to write a Portfile today that fetches the HEAD of a repository. I'm explaining the problems that arise if you do that, and why it is therefore our policy not to permit ports that do that to be introduced into the ports collection.
More information about the macports-users
mailing list