OpenMPI Users - Is Anyone Using openmpi-clang33 or openmpi-clang34?

[Chris Jones]

> On 7 May 2021, at 8:33 pm, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.webuse at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> There is one issue with that.
> 
> qt5-qtcreator needs clang-10 on arm for it’s libraries (that is actually the only reason why I initially fixed clang-10 to work on arm64 in the first place).
> 
> qt5-qtcreator cannot (could not) use any newer clang when I checked six months ago.
> 
> So — we still need clang-10 on arm64 even if we don’t use it as a compiler there.

We can at least though not bother building the openmpi versions for these clangs, even if we have to keep clang10 around for arm until we can migrate the above to clang11.

Cheers Chris
> 
> K
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 7, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Another clean up suggestion is to remove all clangs apart from 11+ for macOS11(arm). I just noticed the buildbots building the clang-9.0 version for arm, but its worth noting that clang 9.0 and 10 are not reliable for arm, I have seen them generate bad code, fail with ICEs, so really there is little point in providing all but the clang11(and newer) version which is the first version with reliable arm support.
>> 
>> Chris
>> 
>>>> On 7 May 2021, at 8:11 pm, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.webuse at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, gcc7 works down to 10.4, both PPC and Intel and is the primary compiler there.  I can see no need for openMPI to support any older gcc.
>>> 
>>> clang-3.3, clang-3.4, and clang-3.7 should not be used for anything other than bootstrapping to newer clangs now.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ken
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>