libgcc9 and other ports that will never build on my system

[chilli.namesake at gmail.com]

No, I got it. Ignore.

And thank you all.

> On Sep 12, 2022, at 15:16, Richard L. Hamilton <rlhamil at smart.net> wrote:
> 
> You can say
> 
> port upgrade outdated and not badport1
> 
> or even
> 
> port upgrade outdated and not \( badport1 or badport2 \)
> 
> 
> although if badport1 (badport2, etc) is depended on by something else being upgraded, it will probably get upgraded too (and fail, I suppose).
> 
> You can upgrade a port without upgrading what it depends on with
> 
> port -n upgrade outdated and not badport1
> 
> but AFAIK, that’s usually NOT recommended except more rarely and specifically than something as broad as port upgrade outdated, to work around a specific problem (for which I gather you should have checked for a ticket and if it didn’t exist already, filed one). Although if dependencies other than badport1 are also included in “outdated", I guess they’ll get updated too, if not necessarily in the ideal order.
> 
> although when I say that, I’m kind of saying do what I say and not what I do, because I wing it a bit just to get through the daily update ritual. My usual looks a bit like the line above with the parenthesized list of what not to update, except rather longer.
> 
> 
>> On Sep 12, 2022, at 3:02 PM, chilli.namesake at gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, you got it. How do I command MacPorts to upgrade all outdated ports "and not" this whatever troublesome port?  Is there a way? If you just told me, you'll have to be less subtle.
>> 
>>>> On Sep 12, 2022, at 14:00, Bill Cole <macportsusers-20171215 at billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
>>> On 2022-09-12 at 12:04:41 UTC-0400 (Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:04:41 -0400)
>>> <chilli.namesake at gmail.com>
>>> is rumored to have said:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks for catching that.
>>>> 
>>>> From my macports.conf file:
>>>> # CPU architecture to target. Supported values are "ppc", "ppc64",
>>>> # "i386", "x86_64", and "arm64". Defaults to:
>>>> # - Mac OS X 10.5 and earlier: "ppc" on PowerPC, otherwise "i386".
>>>> # - Mac OS X 10.6 - 10.15: "x86_64" on 64-bit Intel, otherwise "i386".
>>>> # - macOS 11 and later: "arm64" on Apple Silicon, otherwise "x86_64".
>>>> build_arch              x86_64
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> thus, I was not trying to build for i386, I've specified x86_64
>>> 
>>> If for some reason you had built it with the 'universal' variant you could also end up rebuilding it for both. But as I said, I don't think this is the point of attack.
>>> 
>>>> I find it difficult to believe MacPorts has no control over what it is updating.
>>>> MacPorts upgrade command obviously has some way to know what ports have updates available:
>>>> 
>>>> port upgrade outdated
>>>> 
>>>> The outdated argument tells upgrade what to update. I was hoping it would be something simple like
>>>> 
>>>> port upgrade outdated -libgcc9
>>> 
>>> Like I said...
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2022, at 09:29, Bill Cole <macportsusers-20171215 at billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>>>> 3. "sudo port upgrade outdated and not libgcc9" should work, but it will leave everything dependent on libgcc9 at older versions.
>>> 
>>> The only difference from your hypothetical command is 'and not' instead of '-'
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Bill Cole
>>> bill at scconsult.com or billcole at apache.org
>>> (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
>>> Not Currently Available For Hire
>> 
>