Renaming a port

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Nov 2, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> What's the recommended way to handle this situation? Is it  
> documented somewhere?

I don't think we have a fixed policy (and if we do, it was developed  
before we switched to subversion, so we didn't have svn mv available).

I would vote to just svn mv it and check in an updated portfile, but  
I could see where an argument could be made to make it easier for  
users who only do 'port upgrade' to know what is going on.

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20061102/8c61ae77/PGP.bin