Easytag2, bug #11456

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Dec 11, 2007, at 22:05, Andrew Cho wrote:

> Simon Ruderich wrote:
>
>> Would it be ok to update the easytag port from version 1.1 to 2.1  
>> and the
>> easytag-devel port to 2.1.3 or is there a specific reason two add  
>> a new
>> easytag2 port?
>>
>> Can we add you as maintainer to the port?
>
> Originally, 1.1 was the stable branch, while the 2.x series was the  
> development branch.  Easytag has since changed 2.1 to stable and is  
> developing the micro-revisions.  I guess it isn't really necessary  
> to have an additional port for the 2.x series anymore.  I've change  
> the port back to easytag.
>
> The updated portfile I attached to the ticket lists myself as  
> maintainer and updates to 2.1.3.

And then easytag-devel can be deleted, right?