mark.duling at biola.edu
Tue Jan 23 22:39:41 PST 2007
Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org> on Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at
10:15 PM -0800 wrote:
>> Port gd2 is at 2.0.33. If gd 1.x is no longer needed couldn't we just
>> delete it and use the gd2 port?
>Aaaa! Yes, why was r21414 committed? I would have thought the point
>of having a gd and a gd2 port was to keep the 1.x and 2.x series
>There may be some cases where programs that worked with gd1 won't
>work with gd2, according to the gd faq:
>How do we discover which ports, if any, depend on gd? "port echo
>depends_lib:gd" does not seem to work (produces an error).
I have found grepping portindex and such to give confusing results, maybe
I just don't know the right method though. I just did a 'port deps all'
and searched the output. I see no dependencies on gd 1.x at all and it
seems unlikely there will be new ports depending on it. I think it is
nukeworthy. Nuke! Nuke! Nuke! Nuke!
More information about the macports-dev