Portfile guidelines (was [26328]
trunk/dports/gnustep/Etoile/Portfile)
Ryan Schmidt
ryandesign at macports.org
Thu Jun 21 13:51:54 PDT 2007
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:29, Yves de Champlain wrote:
> - more obscure names should either have a good description or a
> clearer name like with_* / without_* / enable_* / disable_* to at
> least give a clue if we are triggering a dependency or an inner
> mechanism. A good example : disable_utf8mac,
> disable_extra_encodings, enable_cp932fix (libiconv).
This was suggested once, and implemented in a few ports, but I still
don't see the advantage over the "normal" MacPorts variant naming,
which would be, respectively, +utf8mac, +no_extra_encodings, and
+cp932fix.
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list