Just say no to +universal
pipping at macports.org
Mon Mar 5 01:15:46 PST 2007
On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:10 PM, Elias Pipping wrote:
>> On Mar 4, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> On 2007-03-03 19:44:32 -0800, Reid Nichol wrote:
>>>> Now, as for the messing up the Portfile thing. Yes, everyone
>>>> that having the universal binary hack in every Portfile is messy
>>>> undesirable. Please, stop bringing this up as it really is
>>>> beating a
>>>> dead horse at this point. Also, to assume that this is the only
>>>> for including this functionality is ridiculous.
>>>> So, instead of trashing one bad idea (over and over), how about
>>>> discussing ways that might get this wanted functionality in with
>>>> minimal pain. A couple ideas have already been thrown out
>>>> there. How
>>>> about sticking to discussing those (or other ones)?
>>> Yes, and as this has been said somewhere, this should be done
>>> (perhaps at the autoconf level, with a new option --enable-
>>> Indeed, I don't see why only MacPorts users could be interested in
>>> universal binaries.
>> I guess nobody feels responsible for taking care of universal
> What do you mean?
> I spent dozens of hours getting GNU libtool to work with universal
Well, how would I know? Anyway - sorry, I must've misunderstood you.
More information about the macports-dev