1.6.0 sometime late next week

[Juan Manuel Palacios]

On Nov 24, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Randall Wood wrote:


>> I didn't know we had a presence on SourceForge. They have lots of  
>> services: downloads, issue tracker, mailing lists, web site. Should  
>> we start using those as well? I would say no. We already have an  
>> issue tracker, mailing lists, and web site through Mac OS Forge,  
>> and we have thus far hosted downloads there as well. Let's continue  
>> to host downloads and everything else with Mac OS Forge as well. If  
>> Mac OS Forge's download system is insufficient, we should bring  
>> that up with Mac OS Forge management, not jump ship to SourceForge.  
>> I think we shouldn't be using SourceForge for anything. Not that I  
>> have anything against them at all. We just already have  
>> alternatives. Let's keep everything in one place.
>

	I'm not advocating we move any of our services anywhere, our  
relationship with Mac OS Forge is only improving by the day ;-) We  
will keep using all our regular services on our kind host, including  
our existing download venues. I did suggest, however, that we:

>
> The only really possibly useful service for us that SourceForge (SF)  
> has is that massive geographically dispersed mirrored download  
> service.


	Leverage SoureForge's geographically distributed download mirrors in  
addition to Mac OS Forge's servers, just for higher availability.

	Regards,...


-jmpp