Trac ticket mails: default owner for base, ports & www components

[Juan Manuel Palacios]

On Nov 28, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:

>
> On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:06 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
>
>>
>> 	Now that Trac mailing features are working for us, does it still  
>> make sense to have this list, dev, as the default owner for the  
>> base, ports & www components of tickets? As you may have already  
>> seen, if we keep it like that we're going to start getting a lot of  
>> mail for a lot of tickets here.
>>
>> 	I say we change the default owner to the tickets list for ports  
>> with no real owners, as activity on them will no longer be lost to  
>> an eternal black hole. Anyone against it?
>>
>> 	Regards,...
>>
>>
>> -jmpp
>
>
> 	So, after only a single day of Trac mails coming to this list  
> because of the default owner of some of the ticket components, I  
> feel the need to change that to macports-tickets is more than  
> obvious now. Not only because of the sheer quantity of mails, but  
> also because macports-tickets is the right list them (the only  
> reason why this one was chosen as the default owner is because back  
> then Trac mailing functionality was disabled, and as a result no one  
> payed attention to the tickets list).
>
> 	I'll be switching the default owner for the base, ports & www  
> components to macports-tickets shortly, but first Bill and I need to  
> figure some stuff out about valid ticket owners, who's on that list  
> and how to keep it up to date.
>
> 	Regards,...
>
>
> -jmpp



	If anyone is wondering why I still haven't completed this and we're  
still getting Trac mail on this list, Bill and I are working out some  
details about the assignee list for tickets on Trac, which was shrunk  
when we upgraded to Trac 0.10.4 and currently does not contain  
macports-tickets as an allowed assignee, so therefore I cannot set it  
as default owner for tickets.

	I'l inform of progress (Trac mail on this list is getting so  
seriously annoying! -- not to mention that we're failing to  
concentrate this information in the single place where it should be,  
the tickets list)


-jmpp