PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

Daniel J. Luke dluke at
Fri Sep 7 11:47:09 PDT 2007

On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> Last time this was brought up only one person complained,

?? Every few months this comes up. There are a few people vocally in  
favor of one way or another to do things. I think most people don't  
care too much.

> but it really is a serious problem and we need standards.


> Therefore I propose the following:


My counter proposal is as follows:

Whitespace rules inside of Portfiles are the maintainer's  
prerogative. Portfile authors should be consistent with their  
application of whitespace.

When working on base/ code, the author should conform to the existing  
whitespace conventions of the code he/she is working on.

These are the current, repeatedly agreed to, standards anyway.
Daniel J. Luke
| *---------------- dluke at ----------------* |
| *-------------- -------------* |
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :

More information about the macports-dev mailing list