2-architecture +universal variants please (was: Re: [32999] trunk/base/ChangeLog)

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Jan 17, 2008, at 02:46, Anders F Björklund wrote:

> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>> Also, it would be more "universal" if it was to use the 10.4u SDK  
>>> on Leopard too, since then the generated binaries would work on  
>>> Tiger in addition. (currently it uses the 10.5 SDK if available)
>>
>> Yes, but I understood that it was changed to use the 10.5 SDK on  
>> Leopard because using the 10.4u SDK on Leopard was broken?
>
> No, the usage of it was broken. It wasn't setting  
> MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET (to use 10.4)
>
> "ld: library not found for -lcrt1.10.5.o"
>
> Changing to the 10.5 SDK made the problem "go away", since it would  
> work with M_D_T=10.5

Oh I see! Then yes, by all means, we should use the 10.4u SDK and set  
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to 10.4.