postfix +tls upgrade broken

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> But in general, this is how the final update to openssl @1.0.0 will  
> go.
> Every dependent need to be rebuild as usually for every upgrade. Just
> that in this case it will affect many ports and will probably cause  
> much
> confusion at first.
>
> I don't think there is a better solution currently than advising to  
> run
> 'sudo port -R upgrade openssl' when it is released, even if it will
> probably trigger a lot of unnecessary rebuilds.


In the past, we have rev-bumped every port that we thought would need  
a rebuild when we've done something like this...

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20090403/9d70ebb9/attachment.bin>