macports dovecot sieve

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Dec 17, 2009, at 02:20, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:

> On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2009, at 01:26, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> 
>>> Should I bother submitting dovecot sieve and if so what should I name it?
>> 
>> Maybe dovecot-sieve? There is an open request to add a +sieve variant to dovecot; maybe your separate port would satisfy this request. A separate port is probably better for usability than a variant anyway.
>> 
>> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/11810
> 
> There are two sieve options for dovecot, Dovecot Sieve for Dovecot 1.2 and newer and CMU Sieve for Dovecot 1.0 through 1.2.
> 
> So dovecot-sieve and later if someone wants the other they could create dovecot-cmu-sieve?

Oh, I see. Well that sounds ok. In any case it will be good to have any sieve option for dovecot in MacPorts.