[47804] trunk/dports/devel/cmake/Portfile

cssdev at mac.com cssdev at mac.com
Sat Mar 7 14:50:09 PST 2009


On Mar 7, 2009, at 4:11 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

> On Mar 6, 2009, at 15:49, toby at macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 47804
>>          http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47804
>> Author:   toby at macports.org
>> Date:     2009-03-06 13:49:15 -0800 (Fri, 06 Mar 2009)
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> cmake 2.6.3
>
> [snip]
>
> Did the maintainer approve this update, or was there a ticket filed  
> to which the maintainer did not respond within 72 hours?

Neither. I've been checking some other build issues with CMake, but I  
would prefer that we follow the procedure of creating tickets,  
assigning them to maintainers, and referencing them in commit messages.

Could we enable the Trac pre-commit-hook[1] that requires commit  
messages to reference open tickets? There have been a number of recent  
commits to ports without references to tickets, and that makes it hard  
to dig through Trac to find the background info for a particular  
commit. That's annoying for ports I maintain, especially without  
either any contact with me or tickets filed in Trac. (There have been  
some timeouts too, but that's part of the process. :)

I think we should require port commits to reference existing, open  
Trac tickets.

Chris

[1]: http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/contrib/trac-pre-commit-hook



More information about the macports-dev mailing list