[51041] trunk/dports/textproc/gpsbabel
Ryan Schmidt
ryandesign at macports.org
Sat May 16 18:30:47 PDT 2009
On May 16, 2009, at 20:14, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> On May 16, 2009, at 8:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On May 16, 2009, at 13:51, snc at macports.org wrote:
>>
>>> Revision: 51041
>>> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/51041
>>> Author: snc at macports.org
>>> Date: 2009-05-16 11:51:47 -0700 (Sat, 16 May 2009)
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> version update, maintainer timeout, adding self as openmaintainer
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> name gpsbabel
>>> -version 1.3.5
>>> +version 1.3.6
>>> categories textproc comms
>>> -maintainers macports at michael-behrendt.net
>>> +maintainers snc openmaintainer
>>
>> It's fine that you committed the proposed update since the
>> maintainer did not respond within 72 hours, but did the maintainer
>> really agree to give the port up to you? Was there a port
>> abandonment request filed?
>>
>> http://guide.macports.org/#project.update-policies.abandonment
>
> The portfile posted in the ticket said it was nomaintainer.
>
> I decided that, rather than dropping it entirely I'd pick it up as
> an openmaintainer.
Ok, I see that now, but the ticket does not explain why the submitter
of the ticket would have the authority to reassign the port to
nomaintainer. If there has been communication with the previous
maintainer and he has agreed to release the port, or if multiple
attempts have been made to reach the previous maintainer and he is
unreachable, then that's fine, it just needs to be documented
somewhere. If no such communication has occurred, then you cannot
change the maintainer of the port.
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list