[Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Snow Leopard +universal necessity

[William Davis]

On Sep 2, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:

> On Sep 2, 2009, at 12:14 PM, William Davis wrote:
>>> While some (xulrunner, firefox) just need new inline-asm to be  
>>> written for 64bit support, others (wine) may *NEVER* actually work  
>>> in 64bit.  It may be the case that users need a 32bit wine for  
>>> win32 and a 64bit wine for win64.  ... so it's not really  
>>> trivially fixable when it is by design.
>>
>> Jeremy, I'm sorry to be that unclear: what I meant was "modify the  
>> port file to build universal" for each port that needed that.  In  
>> other words fix the individual port files as needed instead of  
>> building all ports universal..
>
>
> William,
>
> You seem to be missing the idea that the 64bit version of a port  
> needs 64bit versions of all its dependencies (and a 32bit version  
> likewise needs a 32bit version of all of its dependencies).
>
> --
> Daniel J. Luke


No, I'm not but see my last answer to Ryan.


William Davis
frstanATbellsouthDOTnet
Mac OS X ver 10.6 Darwin 10.6
XQuartz 2.3.4 (xorg-server 1.4.2-apple45)
Mac Mini Intel Duo @ 1.86 GHz

Mundus vult decepi, ego non