[Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Snow Leopard +universal necessity
Daniel J. Luke
dluke at geeklair.net
Wed Sep 2 09:35:30 PDT 2009
On Sep 2, 2009, at 12:14 PM, William Davis wrote:
>> While some (xulrunner, firefox) just need new inline-asm to be
>> written for 64bit support, others (wine) may *NEVER* actually work
>> in 64bit. It may be the case that users need a 32bit wine for
>> win32 and a 64bit wine for win64. ... so it's not really trivially
>> fixable when it is by design.
>
> Jeremy, I'm sorry to be that unclear: what I meant was "modify the
> port file to build universal" for each port that needed that. In
> other words fix the individual port files as needed instead of
> building all ports universal..
William,
You seem to be missing the idea that the 64bit version of a port needs
64bit versions of all its dependencies (and a 32bit version likewise
needs a 32bit version of all of its dependencies).
--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
| Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
| reflect the opinions of my employer. |
+========================================================+
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20090902/7a6c86d3/attachment.bin>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list