startupitems and port load

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Sep 13, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I assume this means there are ports that would not work right when  
> managed directly by launchd. Can anybody think of any examples of  
> this?

Anything that calls daemon() or fork()s to run in the background and  
also doesn't have an option to not do this.

... also anything that uses daemondo's system state transition  
handling (like bind9 uses --restart-netchange)

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+