A few new features for `port`

[Galen Wright-Watson]

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Galen Wright-Watson <ww.galen at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Galen Wright-Watson <ww.galen at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'll look into converting actinact and nodependents into pseudoports later
>> this week.
>>
>
> This also includes adding a flag so the leaves pseudoport includes
> requested ports, rather than a separate nodependents/nodepts pseudoport.
>
>
It's been a little more than a week, but I've got patches for an "actinact"
(#27666 <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/27666>) and "nodepts" pseudo-ports.
In the interest of reducing code repetition, common code from a number of
pseudo-port functions was first moved to a separate function, which was then
used as the basis for "nodepts". Should the refactoring be a separate patch
from the "nodepts" pseudo-port? If anyone wishes to examine the patches,
they're attached.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20101214/00435e31/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: port.tcl-get_ports_by.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 11676 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20101214/00435e31/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: port.tcl-nodepts.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 12194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20101214/00435e31/attachment-0003.obj>