[68957] trunk/base/ChangeLog

Joshua Root jmr at macports.org
Wed Jun 23 17:32:14 PDT 2010


On 2010-6-24 10:15 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 15:04, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> 
>>> The sha256 checksum was broken?
>>
>> Yes, the function didn't exist (second half of the patch)!
>>
>> At first I figured it was just that we hadn't applied it yet to debug message. When i looked further, running `port -d checksum` without the latest patch resulted in port believing that the port's checksum for a file didn't even exist.
> 
> My point was there was nothing broken about sha256 in MacPorts, and your patch did not fix anything. Rather, it added a new functionality: it added a sha256 line to the debug output from the checksum phase when the checksums don't match.

What? Having all 4 checksums in the "correct checksums line may be"
message may be a little excessive, but sha256 could not be used in
portfiles before this patch...

> For one thing, this has now caused issues for those running trunk who don't realize that they now can't just copy and paste that into a port (because it doesn't work with MacPorts 1.9):
> 
> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25396

... as demonstrated by this very ticket.

- Josh


More information about the macports-dev mailing list