[73027] trunk/dports/lang/sbcl/Portfile

[Jeremy Lavergne]

> Logically I agree that your request makes sense, but I need some
> conceptual help here due to my limited knowledge of Portfiles.  The
> 'html' variant works by patching the SBCL source to not install the
> full documentation.  The 'pdf' variant needs this code not to be
> patched to execute.  I didn't see a  way to temporally order the
> execution of variant code-blocks, so I didn't know how to guarantee
> the 'pdf' variant always "undoes" the patch if both variants are
> specified.  If there is no way to temporally order variant clauses,
> I guess the way around this is to find a Portfile phase after all
> the variants have been executed to cleanup the corner cases.
> 
> With my submission of the sbcl-1.0.44 update yesterday, the 'html'
> variant is no longer the default.
> 
> How would the "grayer beards" than mine of MacPorts suggest I tackle
> Ryan's suggestion?

You might simply set the two variants as conflicting.

variant X conflicts Y description {Z} { ... }

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3749 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20101112/268fb179/attachment.bin>