[87904] trunk/dports/mail/signing-party/Portfile

[Clemens Lang]

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:13:58PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > +license             {BSD GPL-2+ GPL-2}
> 
> I think there's no point listing GPL-2 if you're already listing GPL-2+. "2" is included in "2 or greater".

The signing-party port contains some software licensed under BSD, some
licensed under GPL-2 and some under GPL-2 or any later version. I think
this representation is closest to reality, as you can't just distribute
the whole package under the terms of GPL-3 (which would be possible if I
didn't list GPL-2 explicitly).
So, if any correction should be made, I'd suggest removing GPL-2+,
rather than GPL-2. Does having all three of them cause any problems?

-- 
Clemens Lang
GSoC Student