[87904] trunk/dports/mail/signing-party/Portfile

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Dec 11, 2011, at 18:20, Clemens Lang wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:13:58PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> +license             {BSD GPL-2+ GPL-2}
>> 
>> I think there's no point listing GPL-2 if you're already listing GPL-2+. "2" is included in "2 or greater".
> 
> The signing-party port contains some software licensed under BSD, some
> licensed under GPL-2 and some under GPL-2 or any later version. I think
> this representation is closest to reality, as you can't just distribute
> the whole package under the terms of GPL-3 (which would be possible if I
> didn't list GPL-2 explicitly).
> So, if any correction should be made, I'd suggest removing GPL-2+,
> rather than GPL-2. Does having all three of them cause any problems?

Oh right, I thought you were listing "and" licenses but you were listing "or" licenses. No change then. I'm not aware of any problems listing the licenses this way.