[87904] trunk/dports/mail/signing-party/Portfile

Ryan Schmidt ryandesign at macports.org
Sun Dec 11 16:39:23 PST 2011

On Dec 11, 2011, at 18:20, Clemens Lang wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:13:58PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> +license             {BSD GPL-2+ GPL-2}
>> I think there's no point listing GPL-2 if you're already listing GPL-2+. "2" is included in "2 or greater".
> The signing-party port contains some software licensed under BSD, some
> licensed under GPL-2 and some under GPL-2 or any later version. I think
> this representation is closest to reality, as you can't just distribute
> the whole package under the terms of GPL-3 (which would be possible if I
> didn't list GPL-2 explicitly).
> So, if any correction should be made, I'd suggest removing GPL-2+,
> rather than GPL-2. Does having all three of them cause any problems?

Oh right, I thought you were listing "and" licenses but you were listing "or" licenses. No change then. I'm not aware of any problems listing the licenses this way.

More information about the macports-dev mailing list