Ryan Schmidt ryandesign at
Sat Dec 24 12:17:09 PST 2011

On Dec 24, 2011, at 11:12, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:

> On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>> On 2011-12-24 16:56 , Dan Ports wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 07:04:26PM -0800, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>>> On Dec 23, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>>>> Please make fuse4x build on PPC before removing MacFUSE.
>>>> Nevermind.
>>>> Setting 'universal_archs ppc' solved this error.
>>> Hmm. We build the fuse4x kext universal by default because its
>>> architecture needs to match the running kernel, not userland, and we
>>> don't have any other way to specify that.
>>> Maybe we shouldn't be doing that on ppc? I don't have a PPC machine
>>> around to test it...
>> Yeah, no version of OS X has a ppc64 kernel.
> Setting my universal_archs to only ppc in macports.conf produces this error:
> $ port installed
> Warning: invalid universal_archs configured (should contain at least 2 archs)
> The following ports are currently installed:
> On this ppc system I cannot think of a situation where I would want to build i386. I can live with this warning; is there any reason not to leave universal_archs ppc only?

Setting universal_archs to only a single arch doesn't make sense, isn't tested, and isn't supported. If you don't want universal, don't build universal. If fuse4x-kext is forcing universal and shouldn't be on PowerPC, then we should fix the port.

More information about the macports-dev mailing list